v2026-06-14Last verified 2026-06-14

Glass Box — How we classify AI tools

Every classification in our index is deterministic. No LLM in the classification path. This page shows the full decision tree, live test cases from the index, and the classifier version so you can audit or reproduce any result.

100

tools classified

16

high risk

34

limited risk

50

minimal risk

Classifier decision tree

Applied in order, top to bottom. The first matching condition determines the risk tier. Based on EU AI Act (2024/1689) as amended by the Digital Omnibus Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (in force 27 July 2026).

1

Does the system match any Article 5 prohibited practice?

Yes → PROHIBITED — ban applies since 2 February 2025No → Continue to step 2

Article 5

2

Does the use case match any Annex III category (as amended by Digital Omnibus)?

Yes → HIGH RISK — Annex III obligations; score 7-10No → Continue to step 3

Article 6 + Annex III

3

Does the system generate synthetic content, run as a chatbot, or perform emotion recognition?

Yes → LIMITED RISK — Article 50 transparency obligations; score 4-6No → Continue to step 4

Article 50

4

No mandatory EU AI Act obligations apply for the typical deployment pattern.

Yes → MINIMAL RISK — no mandatory obligations; score 1-3

Recital 47

Score modifiers within each tier

FactorWeightWhat it measures
Decision impact on individuals+0 to +2How consequential the AI output is for real people. Autonomous employment or credit decisions score +2.
Provider EU compliance posture+0 to +1Whether the vendor has published EU AI Act documentation. Absence of provider docs adds 1 point within the tier.
Deployment autonomy+0 to +1Fully autonomous outputs (no human review required) score +1 vs decision-support tools.

Final score = base tier floor + sum of modifiers, capped at the tier ceiling. Full factor definitions: /methodology.

Live test cases from the index

These are real entries from the 100-tool index, pulled live. They serve as regression anchors — any future classifier update must produce the same output for all of these cases.

HireVueHigh Risk9/10

Recruitment AI

Annex III, Category 4 — automated candidate screening

verified

2026-06-12

ChatGPT (OpenAI)Limited Risk5/10

Generative AI Assistant

Article 50 — chatbot transparency (if customer-facing)

verified

2026-06-12

BeameryHigh Risk8/10

HR & Recruitment

Annex III, Category 4 (employment, workers management)

verified

2026-06-14

ZestAIHigh Risk9/10

Financial AI

Annex III, Category 5 — AI for credit scoring and creditworthiness assessment

verified

2026-06-14

SynthesiaLimited Risk6/10

Synthetic Media AI

Article 50(4) — synthetic audio-visual content depicting persons (deepfake labeling)

verified

2026-06-14

TabnineMinimal Risk2/10

Developer Tools

Minimal risk — internal developer productivity tool

verified

2026-06-14

All 100 entries at /vendors. Machine-readable via POST /api/classify.

Download the full methodology pack

The full pack includes: complete Article-by-Article obligation matrix for deployers, all 100 test cases with score derivations, Annex III category mapping table, and Digital Omnibus deferral analysis. PDF, CC BY licensed.

No spam. One email with the pack. Unsubscribe any time.

Audit trail

Classifier versionv2026-06-14
Index size100 tools
LLM in classification pathNone — deterministic only
Legal basisEU AI Act 2024/1689 + Regulation (EU) 2026/1744
LicenseCC BY 4.0 — cite freely with attribution
Dispute / correctionSubmit right-of-reply →